Ministry of Small Scale Industries
Government of India
Office of Development Commissioner (Small Scale Industries)
Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi

 

NoTM/UND/2005


Nirman Bhawan
New Delhi – 110011
Dated 14 March 2006

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: - Guidelines of the Small Industries Cluster Development Programme (SICDP)

    Introduction

    1. The Ministry of Small Scale Industries (SSI), Government of India (GoI) has adopted the cluster approach as a key strategy for enhancing the productivity and competitiveness as well as capacity building of small enterprises (including small scale industries and small scale service and business entities) and their collectives in the country. Among other things, this approach also facilitates substantial economies of scale in terms of deployment of available resources for effective implementation and more sustainable results in the medium to long term.

    2. In view of the large number and dispersed locations of the small enterprise clusters and varied status of collaborative self-help capabilities of these cluster-based enterprises across the country, the success of this Programme depends not only the initiatives of the cluster-based enterprises but also on the active involvement of the State Governments and other institutions engaged in the promotion of small enterprises. The following guidelines are, therefore, issued, in supersession of the existing guidelines, to assist all the stakeholders in formulating proposals for financial support from the Ministry of Small Scale Industries for implementation of cluster development initiatives under the Small Industries Cluster Development Programme (SICDP).

    3. Implementing Agencies

    3.1 A clear legal entity with evidence of prior experience of positive collaboration among its members, whether formally or otherwise, as the applicant of the proposed cluster development initiative assures sound management. Ideally, therefore, all proposals for cluster development seeking assistance under the SICDP must emanate from special purpose vehicles (SPV), consisting of the actual/likely cluster beneficiaries/enterprises organised in any legally recognised form like a cooperative society, registered society, trust, company, etc.

    3.2.1 Considering, however, the uneven state of development of such collaborative initiatives among small (and tiny or micro) enterprises in the country, it would be permissible for a lead Government institution to be the prime mover of a proposal for cluster development in the initial stages of its conceptualisation, design, determination of technical parameters, project preparation and documentation, etc., in consultation with the cluster beneficiaries. It will, however, be necessary to constitute the SPV at the earliest possible, with clear indication of the time frame for completion of this essential requirement while submitting the proposal for Government assistance.

    3.2.2 In short, in addition to the SPVs of cluster beneficiaries, institutions/agencies of the following categories will, therefore, be eligible to propose and implement cluster development projects under the SICDP, with financial support of the Ministry of SSI

  • Field organisations/offices and autonomous/public sector institutions/enterprises of the Ministry of SSI, Ministry of Agro and Rural Industries (ARI) and other Ministries of the Government of India.
  • State Governments and their autonomous/public sector organisations.
  • National and international institutions engaged in promotion and development of the small enterprises, including SSI, sector.
  • Any other institution/agency approved by the Ministry for this purpose, keeping in view the special circumstances applicable to a State or Union Territory.

    Selection of Cluster(s)

    4. Detailed study of the features of the clusters with due care and application are essential prerequisites for selection of a cluster of the right type. The criteria may vary to some extent depending on the type of clusters and the goals sought to be achieved through the cluster development initiatives. However, broadly, the following illustrative aspects should be kept in view:

  • Importance of the clusters (s) in terms of number of units, employment, production, exports, etc.
  • Existence of critical gaps in technology, product quality, common facilities, skill upgradation, availability of raw material, marketing support, etc.National and international institutions engaged in promotion and development of the small enterprises, including SSI, sector.
  • Viability of the cluster.
  • Vibrancy of local industry association and/or interest evinced by other institutions engaged in development financing and SSI promotion in development of the cluster.
  • Social and environmental considerations like gender inequalities, poverty conditions, need for employment generation, pollution scenario, etc.
    5. Clusters of SSI units manufacturing products which fall under the administrative purview of other Ministries of the Government of India may also be considered for financial assistance under this Programme, with the consent of the Ministry concerned.

    6. In case the implementing agency is not the Government of the State in which the cluster is located or an organisation of that State Government, the agency will also need to necessarily consult the State Government concerned and take its views into account while selecting the cluster and drawing up the strategy and/or action plan for its development.

    Illustrative Steps in Cluster Development Programme

    7. The main steps are:

  • Selection of cluster(s)
  • Selection of Cluster Development Executive(s)
  • Trust building
  • Diagnostic study
  • Preparation of action plan
  • Approval of budget and leveraging of funds from various institutions
  • Implementation of the action plan
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • Handing over and exit
  • Self-management phase
  • Cluster Development Executive (CDE)

    8. An officer/executive of the cluster-based SPV or the implementing agency (other than the SPV) has to be selected and trained to act as the Cluster Development Executive (CDE). The CDE is required to conduct the Diagnostic Study, prepare the Action Plan based on the former and get the Plan implemented with full participation of the Cluster Actors, so as to build up the collective capacity of the units in the Cluster to sustain and carry on the promotional as well as commercial activities in the long run even after the project comes to an end.

    9. In case the selected cluster is far away from the office of the implementing agency, office space may be provided to the CDE on rent with basic equipment and furniture, etc., within or near the cluster. Funds will, however, not be provided by Ministry of SSI for construction of office building, purchase of vehicle, costly furniture and furnishing, etc. Provision for office expenditure and travelling expenses at a reasonable scale, usually ranging between 10 to 15 per cent of the total project cost, may also be considered depending on necessity.

    10. The National Resources Centre (NRC) for SSI Cluster Development created at the
    National Institute of Small Industry Extension and Training (NISIET), Hyderabad-500 045 and the International Centre for Cluster Competitiveness and Growth (IC3G) at the Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, P.O. Bhat-382428, District - Gandhinagar, Gujarat have been established for providing training and related services for cluster development. They conduct courses spread over 3 to 4 weeks for training of CDEs on the tools and methodology of conducting diagnostic studies and implementing cluster development initiatives. Implementing agencies may approach the NRC or IC3G for organising training of the CDEs after their project proposals are approved by the Ministry of SSI

    Cost of Project and Government of India Contribution.

    11. The project cost may vary from cluster to cluster and will depend on parameters like the duration of the project (usually 3 years), size of the cluster, nature and scope of the proposed interventions, etc., as emerged from the diagnostic study. However, contribution of the Ministry of SSI will not exceed 80 per cent of the total project cost, subject to a ceiling of Rs.10 crore per project including Rs. 10 lakh for “soft activities” i.e. capacity building activities in the cluster where no fixed asset is acquired or formed.

    12. The formats of proposals for such soft interventions are detailed in Part I of the enclosures to these guidelines (Annex I to IV). These need to be adhered to strictly.

    13.1.a. Wherever required, assistance under this Programme may also be considered for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in the cluster. The Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the CFC together with appraisal report prepared by a bank (if bank financing is involved) or an independent Technical Consultancy Organisation/reputed Consultant will have to be submitted in such cases.

    13.1.b. With the grant-in-aid sought from the Government, the proposed CFC must be financially and operationally as viable as any commercial project. As a result, all CFC proposals should comply with the financial norms of appraisal that a commercial bank would seek, e.g., internal rate of return, break-even point analysis, debt-service coverage ratio, sensitivity analysis, etc., using basic templates such as projected profit & loss account and projected balance sheet for the proposed CFC. The proposed CFC must also justify its need in terms of its likely impact at the level of an individual representative enterprise of the group that it intends to benefit.

    13.1.c. In keeping with the objective as stated at the beginning of paragraph 13.1.b above , CFC projects would be classified and the Central Government (viability gap funding) assistance therefor would be based on the following broad norms:

  • Developmental CFC projects: Central Government support of 70 per cent of the project cost and the remaining to be provided by the State Government concerned and the project beneficiaries.
  • Quasi-Developmental CFC projects: Central Government support of 50 per cent of the project cost and the remaining to be provided by the State Government concerned and the project beneficiaries.
  • Quasi-Commercial CFC projects: Central Government support of not more than 30 per cent of the project cost and the remaining to be provided by the State Government concerned and the project beneficiaries.
  • However, in case of clusters of micro and / or village enterprises, i.e., enterprises with investment in plant and machinery (excluding land and building) in each case not exceeding Rs. 25 lakh, the extent of Central Government assistance may be raised to 80, 60 and 40 per cent of the project cost in the three types of CFCs respectively.
  • In all the cases stated above , the entire cost of land and building shall be met by SPV / State Government concerned.

    13.2. Implementing agencies shall be responsible for setting up and commissioning of the CFC on a turn-key basis. The CFC thus established will have to be run by the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) on commercial lines, with enough current revenue surplus to meet all its current expenses as well as cost of replacement/expansion of assets as and when necessary. Ministry of SSI shall not accept any financial liability arising out of operation of any CFC.

    13.3. The formats for proposals in this regard are given in Part II of the enclosures (Annex V and VI). The guiding principles elaborated in Part II need to be gone through carefully.

    14. Contribution of the Ministry of SSI to the total cost of the project will be decided keeping in view the availability and willingness of other stakeholders and partners like State governments, industry associations, firms in the cluster etc. For further details of funding scales, reference is invited to Part I and Part II of the enclosures to these Guidelines. Implementing agencies (including State Governments, cluster beneficiaries and/or their SPVs) are expected to mobilise resources to fund the remaining cost, as detailed in Part I/II of the enclosures.

    Linkages with Business Development Services (BDS)

    15. Development of capacities of BDS providers to meet the needs of small enterprises and establishing linkages between them and small enterprise clusters constitute a priority area of the cluster development strategy. Therefore, the proposed cluster development activities should include establishment of linkages between the cluster units and the BDS providers in the public and private sectors capable of catering to the needs of small enterprises.


    Dovetailing with Other Schemes of the Ministry of SSI/ARI and Schemes of Other Ministries of the Government of India

    16. Implementing agencies will be encouraged to dovetail the cluster development initiatives with other Schemes of the Ministry of SSI/ARI. Similar schemes of other Ministries of the Government of India should also be tapped.

    17. Implementing agencies may, wherever necessary, seek assistance from technical agencies like the Product and Process Development Centres and Central Tool Rooms of the Ministry of SSI as well as the Central Glass and Ceramics Research Institute, Central Leather Research Institute, Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council and other similar institutions of other Ministries and Departments of the Government of India engaged in technology upgradation of client enterprises, including SSIs.

    Formats and Approval of Project Proposals

    18.1. The proposals for seeking financial assistance from the Ministry of SSI should be made in the formats given in Part I and Part II of the enclosures to these Guidelines. These formats, though quite detailed, are still illustrative and necessary additions/amendments to the contents may be done by the implementing agencies, depending on the nature of the cluster and the proposed activities.

    18.2. The proposals will be considered and approved by the Steering Committee of the Small Industry Cluster Development Programme under the chairmanship of Secretary, Ministry of SSI for projects costing Rs. 1 crore and above and of the Development Commissioner (SSI) for projects costing less than Rs. 1 crore. However, projects costing Rs. 5 crore and above will be scruitinised on file by the office of DC(SSI) in consultation with FA, before putting up to the Steering Committee for approval.

    Disbursement of Funds

    19.1 Funds will be released by the office of the DC (SSI) directly to the SPV/IA, under intimation to the State Government. The disbursement schedule of the GoI grant would generally be in accordance with the annual installments requested in the proposal of the project, with justification for the said schedule to be considered and approved by the Steering Committee. However, in general, upfront contribution by the SPV or the beneficiaries share would be a prerequisite before release of the first installment of GoI assistance. Where bank finance is involved, written commitment of the bank concerned to release proportionate funds will also be necessary before release of GoI assistance. This will also apply to the State Government contribution, wherever applicable.


    19.2 Further releases of the GoI grant will be contingent on furnishing of prescribed utilisation certificate(s) and verification of release of contribution by the bank and the State Government. DC (SSI) may also require physical verification of the progress of works before release of the second and subsequent installments of GoI grants.

    Monitoring and Evaluation

    20.1. In case of projects implemented by the State Governments, their autonomous bodies and SPVs with the State Government as one of the stakeholders, monitoring of the projects to ensure satisfactory and time-bound implementation of the activities will be the responsibility of the State Governments concerned. Each State Government will also be required to constitute a Project Steering Committee consisting of representatives of all the stakeholders for this purpose. State Governments will send Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR) on physical and financial parameters progress as well as utilisation certificates prescribed under the General Financial Rules of the Central Government to the Office of the Development Commissioner (Small Scale Industries).

    20.2 In case of cluster development projects not covered by the provisions in the preceding paragraphs, the Ministry of SSI will directly monitor the progress through monitoring committees constituted at the level of the Ministry or through its State level offices.

    20.3 The formats of QPR and Utilisation Certificate are enclosed in Part- I of the enclosures.

    21. This issues with the concurrence of the Integrated Finance Wing vide their
    Dy. No. 5089 dated 07.03.2006

    (SANJEEV KAUSHAL)
    JOINT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (SSI)

    Enclosure – Part I (pp. 8-22)
                       Part II (pp. 23-33)

    Copy to –

    1.) Chief Secretaries (All States/UTs)
    2.) Secretaries of State Governments, in charge of Industries Departments
    3.) Directors of Industries (All States/UTs)
    4.) Directors SISIs
    5.) General Managers (All Tool Rooms)
    6.) Principle Director/Directors (All Autonomous Bodies under DCSSI)
    7.) Principal Director NISIET
    8.) Executive Director NIESBUD
    9.) IF Wing (Fin I), D/o IPP, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, New Delhi.
    10.) Joint Secretary to Govt of India, Ministry of ARI
    11.) Joint Secretary to Govt of India, DIPP, Ministry of Commerce & Industry
    12.) All members of the Steering Committee of SICDP
    13.) Director EDII
    14.) Chairman Coir Board
    15.) CEO, KVIC
    16.) Chairman, NSIC
    17.) CMD, SIDBI
    18.) Chairman/President, National Level Industry Associations
    19.) Chairman/President, State Level Industry Associations
    20.) Chairman/President, Cluster Level Industry Associations
    21.) PS to Minister (SSI&ARI)
    22.) PPS to Secretary (SSI&ARI)
    23.) PS to AS&DC (SSI)
    24.) Addl. Development Commissioners
    25.) Joint Development Commissioners
    26.) Industrial Advisers O/o DCSSI
    27.) All Divisions, O/o DCSSI
    28.) Adviser (Village &Small Industries), Planning Commission